Moral obligations of multinational corporations

Introduction Majority believe that Multinational Corporations (MNCs) have the moral obligations to support poor countries because of their financial capabilities. However, most of the firms have been subjected to ethical examination concerning their conduct of exploiting the resources in hosting nations.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Moral obligations of multinational corporations specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In fact, libertarian theorists supported the notion that multinational corporations have the moral responsibility of giving back to the society in any form that is deemed beneficial. The reason is that the resources multinational corporations continue to exploit should benefit the whole society. On the contrary, critics argue that the major aim of such organizations is to exploit the resources of host nations for economic, social and ecological expansion. Further, multinational corporations participate in criminal activities that undermine the human dignity (Donaldson 70). The paper argues for the case basing the arguments on various theoretical framework including libertarianism as well as Avoid, Protect and Aid rules of MNCs toward the society. In other words, the paper will focus on the Avoid, Protect and Aid rules of MNCs toward the society to bring out clearly the reasons why multinational corporations have ethical obligation to fulfill. However, the paper will utilize the rights in the global market concept to criticize the views held by libertarian theories to analyze the benefits of MNCs considering treatment of native employees, foreign ventures, transfer of modern expertise and management techniques. The rights in the global market concept examine the need for multinational corporations to uphold individual rights particularly in host countries.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Libertarian theories According to libertarian theories of the corporate and global capitalism, multinational enterprises have moral obligations of returning proceeds to stakeholders within the bounds of moral side-constraints that are grounded in the rules of the game (Arnold 158). In addition, the return of profits should be within the precincts of societal anticipations including promotion of background institutions, legal obligations, morals as well as social corporate responsibility. Core to the benefits multinational institutions offer to the society is the economic aid that is geared towards alleviating societal tribulations. Avoid, Protect and Aid rules of MNCs The realization of social and economic rights Multinational corporations have inserted a lot of social and economic influence in the affairs of the host countries. In fact, with decreased influence of government agencies on the public affairs, multinational corporations are part of the private entities that have increasingly gained a lot of influence on the public affairs. Benefits the public is likely to get from the MNCs are part of the economic rights of an individual. In fact, multinational corporations realize their goals to the community through many ways. The first important avenue is the societal institutions. Strengthening such institutions provides a sure means through which multinational organizations can be utilized to provide aid to the needy people in poor countries (Hsieh 270). The fundamental units of the society such as education, health, economic institutions and governments are critical concerning the operations of business organizations. Multinational corporations have to collaborate with these institutions in order to attain the main role of returning part of their proceeds to the society. In fact, multinational corporations should recognize the importance of various institutions of society and understand that firms cannot operate in a void (Hsieh 170). In oth er words, multinational corporations are part of the economic institutions of society and should benefit the communities in which they operate.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Moral obligations of multinational corporations specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In principle, the multinational enterprises operate in multifaceted circumstances and have moral obligations to meet the demands of various societal institutions including governments, as well as the community hosting their operations. Corporate accountability Besides, the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) currently being applied in a corporate world has been derived from the principles of libertarianism. In fact, the idea of corporate social responsibility has been practiced over the last decades. The notion coins the importance of corporations to the communities surrounding areas where such enterprises operate. In fact, the principle behind CS R is that large corporations are responsible for individual actions. Besides, the benefits of the corporations should be shared by the communities, which are considered as part of the stakeholders. Actually, there is a growing concern among international groups particularly Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) urging global enterprises to balance proceeds with community residency. In other words, multinational corporations have moral obligations to meet the economic, legal and ethical as well as charitable anticipations of the society (Falkenberg 32). In the current global context where market determines the survivability of firms, multinational corporations should include the components of global CSR in operations in order to continue existing. The elements of international CSR entail economic, legal and ethical roles. Further, international enterprises are also expected to be good corporate citizens through philanthropic responsibilities (Arnold 158). In reality, multinational co rporations should be socially responsible through the provision of financial, as well as any other aid the communities may need.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In other words, they should be supportive of the needy communities particularly through direct financial aid or contributing hugely towards activities that alleviate social problems afflicting the society. Core to the libertarian principles are the economic responsibilities of multinational corporations. The main argument is that multinational corporations should indulge in activities that benefit the society. Actually, the foundation of global business processes is to produce goods and services that provide solutions to problems afflicting the society (Falkenberg 20). In other words, profit making which is always the ultimate objective of multinational enterprises should meet requirements of the global society. Essentially, firms should adhere to global strategic management principles that provide ethical guidance on the achievement of production and profit. Through profits, multinational corporations have the capability of providing financial aid or contributing to the actions gea red towards meeting the needs of society (Arnold 159). Besides, multinational corporations can engage in the production of goods and services that directly benefit the society. For instance, multinationals in the pharmaceutical industry can engage in producing anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs that can directly be used to alleviate deaths resulting from HIV/AIDS in poor countries instead of contributing to financial aid. Further, multinational organizations must abide by the specified acceptable rates of return in host nations. The reason is that MNCs operate in countries that are in dire need of aid. Besides, total annual earnings of MNCs equal the host countries’ Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As such, it would be natural for these countries to ask for higher rates of return from the global corporations (Hsieh 266). Nonetheless, one major issue in the current policy is whether multinational corporations have greater responsibilities to the wider society. As observed by libertarian theorists, most scholarly works support the argument that multinational corporations have greater responsibilities to respond to societal needs. However, critics of the view argue that the sole responsibility of multinational enterprises is to guarantee that shareholders obtain their due. In other words, the multinational corporations are responsible to the shareholders and not the society. Activities of MNCs geared towards the society should be considered philanthropic and not a moral duty. In essence, the shareholders should decide whether to share their dividends with the society. Moreover, multinational corporations should respond to the needs of society without hurting the businesses, as well as main objective of maximizing profit. As indicated, calls for multinational corporations to contribute to the needs of society are not only limited to NGOs but also world leaders, activists and scholars. The reason is that considering the financial capabilities, MNCs are in better posit ions to offer assistance. However, assistances from multinational corporations should not go against the main purpose of making profits. The principle of providing aid underlies actions that would prevent an occurrence of a problem. According to this perspective, multinational corporations should take actions geared towards preventing the societal problems by incurring little costs. In fact, costs involved in the social responsibility should be less than the corporate returns. In addition, multinational corporations should act when presented with situations where the costs of preventing major problems afflicting society are relatively small. In other words, MNCs have moral responsibilities of preventing major problems afflicting society at small costs. Essentially, the libertarian principles justify moral actions of the MNCs. Government regulation Multinational corporations often undermine the government regulations in their endeavors in host nations (Donaldson 68). Actually, in the global context, numerous states lack well-defined regulatory frameworks that standardize the ethical obligations of multinational enterprises. Besides, in foreign countries, the operations of multinational corporations are smoothened by the failure of host states to come up with set of laws that protect the civil liberties of workers. In other words, local government officials normally have financial interests in the actions of MNCs thereby opening space for corruption to thrive. Generally, multinational enterprises have moral duties to recognize workers’ freedom of physical movement (Donaldson 70). In other words, workers should not be subjected to strict rules disallowing movements from positions of duty. Additionally, fair trials, freedom from torture as well as ownership of property are significant liberties that workers in multinational enterprises should enjoy. Over the past years, many multinational corporations embraced nepotism by discriminating individuals based on race, sexual orientation, religion, family affiliation as well as social class. Further, labor unions play significant roles to ensure that workers’ rights are upheld and honored (Donaldson 77). As such, multinational corporations are duty-bound to desist from coercive campaigns and strategies that restrict the surfacing of workers’ unions through lobbying host states to prevent emergence of labor movements. Additionally, multinational corporations have in the past aided in overthrowing governments and states as well as offering support for authoritarian heads of governments in order to carry on with unethical activities (Donaldson 79). For example, the overthrow of Honduras government in 1950s was aided by a MNC. Besides, MNCs have moral obligations to refrain from supporting autocratic regimes in emerging democracies as well as bribing public officials. Specifically, Lockheed Company undermined the democratic gains made in Japan by offering inducements to the nation ’s prime minister in order to be awarded jet contracts. Such actions weaken democracy as well as breach the right to national freewill. Multinational enterprises should also observe the authorized legal systems in host nations. Besides, MNCs have moral obligations to observe international conventions and justice systems that protect the rights of individuals. The major focus of international justice revolves on the rights that individuals are supposed to enjoy (O’Neil 182). Nonetheless, international justice often ignores the requirements capable of protecting the rights of individuals. Essentially, multinational corporations have moral obligations of abiding by the varying social contracts they have with host nations. However, multinational enterprises are capable of escaping laws by moving operations from one nation to another (Velasquez 36). Good reputation is an essential aspect in the operations of international firms. In essence, multinational organizations have to ensure that their operations are based on acceptable societal practices, which are not necessarily within the legal domain. In fact, no global business would wish to be listed as the worst performing corporation since such publications lead to loss of good repute (Donaldson 74). Generally, multinational enterprises have a universal responsibility of recognizing norms, practices and anticipations reflecting beliefs that are considered fair and consistent in relation to values and fortifications of ethical rights of stakeholders. In other words, ethical principles of moral philosophy including justice and rights should form the bedrock of business operations. Rights in the global market Multinational corporations have the moral obligations to honor and protect the squashed civil liberties of workers in the global context (Donaldson 67). Further, freedom of speech, basic nutrition and freedom from torture as well as right to education are major issues of concern in several nations. In fact, most countries around the world still deny citizens basic rights. For instance, wife beating and child labor are common in Korea and Central America respectively. Essentially, MNCs have the moral responsibility to decline engaging children in the operations of such firms through employment. Further, the wellbeing of personnel is an important obligation that MNCs must address. Actually, in situations where multinational enterprises are not obliged to follow morals in operations, firms often act against societal expectations. For instance, in 1988, multinational firms in the US and Britain dumped toxic wastes in West African states such as Ghana, Nigeria, Ivory Coast and Guinea Bissau due to rising costs of waste disposal. Conclusion Generally, multinational corporations have moral obligation to the society. In fact, critics argue that MNCs often trade in products that are unsuitable and harmful to the natives of host nations. Additionally, critics argue that multinational en terprises normally undermine the guidelines put in place to protect the rights of workers in host nations. On the other hand, fans of MNCs note that multinational enterprises are significant in the development of host nations through creation of employment opportunities as well as returning earnings within the precincts of societal anticipations to promote background institutions, legal obligations, morals as well as social corporate responsibility. Essentially, respect for core human values, local traditions and belief in the contemporary context when making decisions are critical in shaping ethical conduct of multinational firms. Essentially, lack of clear moral obligations is to blame for the unethical behaviors of MNCs ranging from exploitation of resources, lack of respect for core human rights and cultures. Therefore, multinational enterprises have moral obligations to fulfill in global operations including respecting human values and labor laws. Works Cited Arnold, Denis. â⠂¬Å"Libetarian Theories of the Corporation and Global Capitalism.† Journal of Business Ethics, 48.2 (2003), 155-173. Print. Donaldson, Thomas. â€Å"Rights in Global Market Place.† The Academy of Management Review, 20.1 (1990), 65-91. Print. Falkenberg, Andreas Wyller. â€Å"When in Rome. â€Å"Moral Maturity and Ethics for International Economic Organization.† Journal of Business Ethics, 54.1 (2004), 17-32. Print. Hsieh, Nien-he. â€Å"Does Business have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?† Business Ethics Quarterly, 19.2 (2009), 251-273. Print. O’Neil, Onora. â€Å"Agents of Justice.† Metaphilosophy, 32.2 (2001), 180–195. Print. Velasquez, Manuel. â€Å"International Business, Morality and the Common Good.† Business Ethics Quarterly, 2.1 (1992), 27-40. Print. This essay on Moral obligations of multinational corporations was written and submitted by user Franco Byers to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Sample Essay Questions For ASQ CEQOE

Sample Essay Questions For ASQ CEQOEIf you are still undecided whether to try to read sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE, go ahead and take a look at the article. The questions, which are often called asq CQOEE, are provided in a specific format in order to make them easy for you to understand. It's important that you study the format so that you will be able to come up with your own or perhaps tweak it in some way to fit your needs.These essay questions for ASQ CEQOE provide you with a direct contact with the interviewer. The questions have been written with your target audience in mind. You won't have to think of anything new when you are preparing your essay. The questions will help you immensely to narrow down your subject matter to focus only on topics which are already covered by other students.It's vital that you carefully observe how the questions are phrased. Some questions are designed to test your knowledge while others might be meant to put you under pressure. You shoul d have a clear picture of what you need to cover if you are going to submit your essay.It's also important that you stick to the format of the questions. Some of the sample questions may appear difficult but the purpose of the questions is to increase your chances of being selected for interview. And if you do not do this, the sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE might not help you at all.The essay should have a clear and concise main idea. While reading some sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE you might feel the urge to keep reading the questions until you understand the main idea. This might help you complete your essay but it might also delay your response to the question. Your resume might get thrown out if the interviewer finds out that you were interested in the sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE.In some of the sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE, you might find one or two questions that are related to the topic of your business. Most likely, these questions will help you understand the difference between a business process and a business unit. In other words, these sample questions for ASQ CEQOE will help you analyze your ideas in the context of a business unit.In fact, you can find out more about the different types of sample essay questions for ASQ CEQOE by doing some research online. There are websites where you can get a sample question from the different areas of business.

How Much Do SAT Subject Tests Cost

How Much Do SAT Subject Tests Cost SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Manycompetitive college programsrequire high school students to submit SAT Subject Test scores to be eligible for admission.This usually means spending a little more money on test registration, but fee waivers are available if you're eligible. In this article, I’ll go through how much each SAT Subject Test costs and how fee waivers work for these tests. How Much Does an SAT Subject Test Cost? When you register for subject tests, there is a basic registration fee of $26.This is not associated with a specific test; it’s just a baseline fee that everyone has to pay.Since you'll pay a registration fee for each test date, it makes sense to take multiple tests on the same date.This saves money because you’ll only pay the $26 once rather than two or three times. It costs an additional $18 on top of the $26 registration fee for most subject tests, but the per-test fee goes up to $26 for the language tests with listening sections.These tests include French with Listening, German with Listening, Spanish with Listening, Chinese with Listening, Japanese with Listening, and Korean with Listening. So, if you took the Math 2 Subject Test and the Japanese with Listening Subject Test, you would be charged $26 (basic registration fee) plus $18 (fee for Math 2) plus $26 (fee for Japanese with Listening) for a total of $70. You can take anywhere from one to three regular subject tests on one test date, but you can only take one listening subject test per test date.This means you might be charged as little as $44 for one test day (registration fee plus one regular subject test) or as much as $88 (registration fee plus one listening subject test and two regular subject tests). In comparison, registration for the regular SAT with the essay costs $54.50. That price drops to $43 if you choose to take itwithout the essay. If you don’t make the regular registration deadline, you'll have to pay a late registration fee of $28.There’s also an extra $28 fee if you decide to change your test date, center, or type of test after registration.Waitlist status is available for SAT Subject Tests for an additional fee of $46.You can read more about the SAT waitlist here. This rabbit would ace the listening subject tests. Can You Get a Fee Waiver for SAT Subject Tests? Yes!If you’re eligible, you'll get two fee waivers for the regular SAT and two fee waivers for SAT Subject Tests.One fee waiver covers a whole day of testing for Subject Tests, so you can take three tests with just one fee waiver if you take them all on the same day!You can also use fee waivers for late registration at no extra cost if you miss the regular deadline. But how do you get a fee waiver?If you’re a student in the US, you can qualify for a waiver if one of the following applies to you: You are eligible to participate in the National School Lunch Program Your family meets income eligibility guidelines set by the USDA Food and Nutrition Service You are enrolled in a government program that helps students from low-income families You live in public housing, a foster home, or are homeless You are a ward of the state or an orphan If you think you may need a fee waiver to take SAT Subject Tests, speak to your guidance counselor.Even if you’re not sure you meet the eligibility requirements, it doesn’t hurt to ask in case you do!If you’re eligible for a fee waiver, you’ll also get four additional free score reports and up to four application fee waivers that are valid at most colleges. You'll get two free passes for SAT Subject Test registration if you're eligible for a fee waiver. Conclusion Individual SAT Subject Tests are less expensive than the regular SAT, but they can get a little pricey if you plan to take two or three of them.For standard registration, you have to pay a baseline fee of $26 plus $18 for each regular Subject Test and $26 for each Subject Test with a listening section.You’ll be charged an extra fee for late registration and for making changes to your registration after you've already signed up. Fee waivers are available for SAT Subject Tests if you’re eligible.You will get two SAT Subject Test waivers, and each waiver covers a full day of testing.Try to take all of your subject tests on the same date so that you only have to pay the registration fee once or, if you got the two fee waivers, can retake the test(s) for free. What's Next? Are you unsure of what your target score should be on SAT Subject Tests? Find outwhat a good score looks like for you. If you're still trying to pick your subject tests, read our guide to deciding which ones to take. If subject tests are stressing you out, take a look at this article detailing the easiest tests you can take to get this requirement out of the way. Need a little extra help prepping for your Subject Tests? We have the industry's leading SAT Subject Test prep programs (for all non-language Subject Tests). Built by Harvard grads and SAT Subject Test full or 99th %ile scorers, the program learns your strengths and weaknesses through advanced statistics, then customizes your prep program to you so that you get the most effective prep possible. Learn more about our Subject Test products below:

Evaluation 31 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Evaluation 31 - Essay Example He narrates how he got his entire crew killed and nearly got him killed because he acted like a jerk while on voyage. This essay analyses the events that unfold and justify reasons why the Mariner is ‘cursed’ using strange images and unanswered questions in this ghost story. On leaving the port, the ship escapes a bad storm but in the process gets caught in risky, misty ice field. When an albatross comes to their rescue by providing good winds and steer them through the fog, the Mariner shoots it down. He does not offer a good explanation for such an act and his crew gets so offended that they decide to hang the dead albatross round the Mariner’s neck as a yoke, to remind him of his mistake. Soon the sailors lose the wind, and it becomes very hot. The Mariner is blamed for this bad luck. The ship seemed to be haunted by an evil spirit as bizarre stuff emerges, slimy creatures that walk on the ocean can be seen. As time goes, the crew starts dying of thirst. At a d istance, the Mariner spots a ship and wishes to yell out; unfortunately his mouth is excessively dry and he cannot. He decides to suck of his own blood so as to dampen his lips. Unfortunately, that ship is a ghost ship steered by two spirits, Life-in-Death and Death, the last one people can ever want to meet in a journey. Everybody on the Mariner's ship passes on except him. Still on board with heaps of dead bodies and nasty slimy water snakes, the Mariner escapes his curse by instinctively blessing the ugly snakes, and eventually the albatross falls off his neck and into the ocean. The entire lifeless sailors rise like zombies to steer the ship from the bad storm which is at a distance, the Mariner is however fast asleep. The dead sailors don't in reality resurrect, in their place, angels fill up their remains, and another ghostlike spirit beneath the ocean look like its pushing the boat. On hearing their voices of the dead crew members talking on how he killed the albatross is sti ll has additional self-punishment to do, the Mariner collapses. These two mystifying tone of voices give details how the ship is stirring. The ship ends up back in port yet again following a quick journey. His crewmen are all surrounded with angels. Luckily for the Mariner, a rescue boat turns up to get him back to the shoreline. A man in a good mood called "the hermit" is on board the rescue boat. Hardly has the Mariner been saved from his wrecked ship than a loud noise is heard. His ship sinks. On reaching the seashore the Mariner is very anxious to share his story with the hermit. So anxious is he that he decides to stop the guests at the wedding to narrate to them his story. The Mariner finally tells the Wedding Guest that he wants to be trained how to love others and say his prayers. He leaves for his residence and gets up the following day, "a sadder and a wiser man." This poem is a lyrical ballad which joins two dissimilar genres: intense expressions of emotional and subjecti ve experience (a lyric) and narrative (a ballad). The Rime of the Ancient Mariner contains numerous characteristic that would afterwards turn out to be connected with Romanticism: formal testing, a deep sense of history, elements of the ghostlike, lots of dramatic descriptions of nature, and an interest in relaxed language. This poem is among a collection that fundamentally initiated the lobby group known as British Romanticism. Conclusion The Rime of the Ancient Mariner by English bard Samuel Taylor Coleridge, on the surface investigates infringement of nature and its ensuing mental impacts on the Mariner, who understands the destiny of his team to be a result of him shooting down an albatross. PART B

Entrepreneurship and innovation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Entrepreneurship and innovation - Essay Example Initially, innovation was a preserve of large organisations, which invested in improving their R&D capabilities. However, in the modern business environment, individuals are leaving the corporate world to start their own businesses. As a result, venturing into business as an individual requires an emphasis on innovation to gain advantage in a competitive business environment. On the same note, innovation for an entrepreneur requires the ability to generate new ideas that are unique in the marketplace (Crumpton, 2012). In addition, innovation requires entrepreneurs to prepare adequately for the unexpected changes in the business environment. Conversely, entrepreneurship has challenges and requires a well-thought plan by prospective entrepreneurs prior to venturing into a particular business (Crumpton, 2012). This paper examines the key elements of contemporary entrepreneurship and innovation as they apply to the development of individual characteristics associated with effective entre preneurs. In the modern business environment, entrepreneurship is a challenging venture for individuals who want to start a business with the aim of making profits. The business environment is competitive and entrepreneurs compete for the same market with large organisations that capitalise on economies of scales. In this regard, the individual characteristics of an entrepreneur are critical for survival in a competitive business environment. The modern business environment is dynamic because of technological advancement. In this sense, the development of effective entrepreneurs requires adaptation to such changes in order to remain competitive in the marketplace. Entrepreneurs often start small and as such, venturing into business has many risks compared to large organisations with sufficient start up capital (Johnson, 2001). Further, entrepreneur’s main challenge in setting up a business is the start-up capital and most entrepreneurs experience failures with their

Art is Art Essay Example for Free

Art is Art Essay What is considered art has been a controversial question for many years in history and today. There are various forms and types of art. Because art is very complex and diverse, it is viewed and conceptualized in many different ways. Nancy G. Heller states even though a type of artwork is hard to understand, it’s considered art, and artwork that people don’t understand shouldn’t be disregarded from other types of art. She feels as though people shouldn’t be intimidated by artwork that’s hard to understand and her main goal is to try to help people feel more comfortable around art they don’t understand. Picasso believes that all art needs to be an original in order to be considerably successful. He states that nature and art are completely different things. Picasso explains that art is a lie that allows us to realize the truth. And finally, John Berger speaks about publicity being a form of art, and how it uses art to manipulate people into buying what is publicized. Berger says publicity ads have a way of working because ads focus on the future, which people are attracted to more than the present. Each of these authors have different opinions on how art is viewed and conceived, however they unite from similar points in their views. All art is art, and shouldn’t be dismissed. In â€Å"’Statement to Marius De Zayas,’ 1923,† Picasso states that art has to convince people of its truthfulness. In his article, Picasso defends the art of cubism.—because cubism, like many other types of art, is not understood yet by most people. However, cubism isn’t any different from a type of art someone likes and understands—it shares the same principles or elements as any/ all other types of art. Picasso elaborates on his claims by giving the reader an example of him reading an English book. He says that reading a book doesn’t make sense to him, yet it doesn’t mean that the English language doesn’t exist. He states that no one should be responsible for him not being able to understand what he doesn’t know much about. Picasso believes that an individual shouldn’t say a type of art isn’t art only because they don’t understand it. The individual should, instead, try to understand it, and if he/ she still doesn’t consider it to be an art, the individual should claim to just dislike that specific type of art. Picasso and Heller both agree that art is art and that it shouldn’t be questioned. Nancy G. Heller’s book, â€Å"Why a Painting is Like a Pizza: a Guide to Understanding and Enjoying  Modern Art† starts with the author’s experience making a pizza in Texas. From her experience, she concluded that painting is like a pizza. Just as many people have a variety of taste in pizza that they prefer, when people look at art, they have certain preferences in art as well. Some people usually completely dismiss certain groups of art, saying its not art at all. Heller defends artists who are victims of these cruel remarks by saying, â€Å"anything anyone says is art should be in fact be regarded as art† (Heller 10). All art should not only be regarded as art, but art also is a lie that uncovers the truth. In Heller’s article, one of her examples shows Rosa Bonheur’s painting â€Å"’The Horse Fair’ (1853).† This painting is very realistic like a photograph. On the contrary, the painting is just very convincing. Bonheur’s painting of the galloping horses lie to the viewer, because the horses aren’t actually galloping in front of the viewer. However, it helps the viewer recognize the truth from the artist’s lies. All art lies, which help the viewer, uncover the truth. Nature and art aren’t the same. Only something real can be natural. Picasso agrees with Heller by saying, â€Å"nature and art, being two different things, cannot be the same thing. Through art, we express our conception of what nature is not† (Picasso par. 5). Picasso states that art needs to be an original idea—otherwise it is useless. An artwork being orig inal allows the viewer to notice the truth. He suggests that art isn’t actually what the artwork portrays. â€Å"Art is not truth. Art is a lie that makes us realize the truth† (Picasso par. 3). Although paintings aren’t real, it can symbolize something that is real. In â€Å"Ways of Seeing† by John Berger, the author talks about all art (publicity ads or paintings) must be convincing to the viewer. â€Å"Publicity begins by working on a natural appetite for pleasure. But it cannot offer the real object of pleasure and there is no convincing substituted for pleasure in that pleasure’s own terms. The more convincingly publicity conveys the pleasure of bathing in a warm, distant sea, the more the spectator-buyer will become aware that he is hundreds of miles away from that sea and the more remote the chance of bathing in it will seem to him† (Berger 132). The author gives an example of how publicity ads work by suggesting if a publicity ad was to show the pleasures of bathing in a warm  and distant sea, the viewer (or buyer) will realize that he is many miles away from the sea that the ad is portraying, and the chance of bathing in that sea will seem far to him. If the viewers aren’t convinced from art, whether it’s a publicity ad or a painting, that artwork is not successful. If a viewer thinks that the representation of whatever the ad is trying to sell is intangible, the viewer will be less convinced. John Berger and Picasso share the same beliefs that art should live in the present. Since there is constant exposure of publicity ads, Berger believes that ads live in the present. Publicity ads are located almost anywhere in this world. From magazines and TVs to buses and billboards, ads are everywhere. Publicity ads are not only constantly around a person’s surroundings, but also are always updated and/ or renewed. Although Berger talks about publicity ads living in the moment, they never represent the present time. Picasso similarly states, if a painting is looked at and appreciated by the viewer, it’s alive, living in the present. Picasso’s work has been echoed in his own idea. All of his work â€Å"was made for the present and with the hope that it will always remain in the present† (Picasso par. 11). Picasso gives an example of the Greek and Egyptian art. He proclaims that Greek and Egyptian art is more alive today than it was when the artwork as cre ated. People are intrigued about how the artwork was made back then, and that alone keeps the early Greek and Egyptian artwork alive in the present. All authors have common beliefs on how art should be viewed and conceived. Art is art and it shouldn’t be questioned. If art is hard to understand, it shouldn’t be dismissed as not art†¦ it should categorized as a type of art an individual dislikes. Furthermore, paintings don’t tell the truth; however it is filled with lies that help an individual recognize the truth through the painting being convincing. And lastly, an artwork lives in the present time—even if the artwork was made in the past. Work Cited Berger, John. Ways Of Seeing. London: Penguin Book, 1977. Print. Heller, Nancy G. Why a Painting is Like a Pizza: a Guide to Understanding and Enjoying Modern Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002. Print. Picasso, Pablo. â€Å"Statement to Marius de Zayas.† The Arts. NY, May 1923. Translation approved by Picasso. Web. 18 September 2012. .

Mummification Essay -- essays research papers

Mummification is the form of embalming practiced by the ancient Egyptians. The mummification process changed over time from the Old Kingdom, when only kings could be mummified to the New Kingdom, in which everyone could be mummified. The entire process of mummification to be completed took 70 days. After a body was delivered to the per nefer, which is where the embalmers conducted their tasks. The first thing that was done was put the deceased on a slanted table. The first thing that needed to be removed was the soft, moist body parts that would cause decay. As the embalmers removed these parts, blood and other bodily fluids came out and went down the table being collected into a bowl. During the old and Middle Kingdoms, the brain was left in the head, in which it just dried up over time. When these mummies are moved you can hear the hardened pieces of the brain rolling around in the mummies head. Then in the New Kingdom, the embalmers started removing the brain. They would break open the bone that separates the nasal cavity from the brain cavity. They did this by shoving a sharp instrument up the nose. After they broke the bone, the embalmers used a hook to either take the brain out piece by piece, or used the hook to stir the brain until it was liquefied. If it was liquefied they would turn the body face down so that the brain would spill out of the nostrils. The reason the Egyptians were so rough with the brain because they didn’t think that the brain had...